THE mood swing from euphoria to panic in the Thai stock market has hit
suddenly and very dramatically. Almost two weeks ago Michel Camdessus, the
former managing director of the International Monetary Fund, announced that he
would confer upon Thailand the institute's highest honour, summa cum laude, and
all because of its planned graduation from the "IMF University" in
June.
But the financial markets were not impressed with the IMF's scorecard on
Thailand: they frantically sold Thai equities in his face.
If you think that the American activist Robert Naiman, who "pied"
Camdessus during his Bangkok appearance, was rude, then the foreign
institutional investors were even ruder. While Camdessus was slightly
embarrassed by the cake-in-the-face incident, Thailand was positively chagrined
by the beating it took from the sudden pullout of the foreign institutional
investors.
The SET index shed some 100 points, losing almost 25 per cent, between
January and the past Wednesday before making a slight rebound over the last two
days. The sharp downward adjustment of equity prices has made life extremely
difficult for the under-capitalised Thai banks and those cash-strapped companies
who depend on the equity market for their liquidity. Is Thailand losing the
confidence game again after all the effort it has taken to put the broken pieces
of the financial crisis back together?
In a way, it appears that the Thai market is being punished once more for its
crime of complacency. For if you read the IMF's or the World Bank's reports on
Thailand closely, you'll find that they are not all that happy with Thailand's
slow progress in banking reform and corporate debt restructuring. But both
institutions have to give Thailand a passing grade. What else can they say - it
would only upset the financial markets even more.
There are several theories behind the dramatic fall of the Thai equities.
First, Thai equities rose substantially between November and December,
outperforming other regional markets. So it was natural that the international
money managers would take their profits in January or February to boost the
performance of their funds or to meet the redemption needs of their clients.
Second, the Morgan Stanley Capital International index, which provides a
benchmark for institutional portfolio investment in the emerging markets, has
moved to cut the weighting in Thai equities from 5 to 4 per cent in favour of
the Taiwan, Malaysia and Korea markets. Passive institutional investors simply
took the advice at face value and adjusted their portfolios accordingly,
resulting in the sharp slide of the Thai market. Given the relatively small size
of the Thai market, it only needs a couple of billion baht to send the SET index
off on a roller-coaster ride. Now the index, which almost broke through the
500-level earlier this year, is dangling below 400 points.
Third, some foreign investors were quite concerned with the new NPLs creeping
into the banking system. Banthoon Lamsam, the chairman of the Thai Bankers'
Association, recently expressed reservations about the economic recovery because
he was still witnessing new NPLs at his bank. Although the net NPLs have fallen
from a peak of 47 per cent last year to 30 per cent, the new NPLs will still
become a burden for the banks. This has dampened the sentiment of the bank
stocks.
The fourth and perhaps most important factor is that foreign investors are
very disappointed with the see-saw fight between creditor banks and Thai
Petrochemical Industry Plc. The lack of progress in debt-restructuring
negotiations, which should have been completed in December, has immensely
undermined confidence in the Thai bankruptcy framework.
If the TPI case cannot be resolved, it will be very difficult to move other
debt-restructuring cases forward. They view that since the Thai economy still
relies heavily on the banking system, creditors should get enough protection for
their lendings so that they have the incentive to take further risk to lend
money to support the economic recovery.
If the court battle surrounding TPI is not resolved to international
expectations, it will send a very negative signal to the financial markets.
Debtors who have money to pay will be tempted not to pay, believing that the
creditors and the law cannot do anything against them. This moral hazard, if it
is allowed to get out of control, will put an end to the Thai recovery.
BY THANONG KHANTHONG