Rerngchai is not the only culprit in crisis
November 30, 2001
General Chavalit Yongchaiyudh, the defence minister,
sprang a big surprise. He revealed yesterday that at the height of the
1997 baht crisis the government he headed struck a secret currency swap
agreement worth a staggering US$10 billion (Bt440 billion) with the Chinese
government.
“But the Bank of Thailand did not use the amount, so we did not have
any other backup plan. But (the central bank) had done its best,” said
Chavalit.
Is that really the case?
Chavalit has every reason to play down the catastrophic episode during
which time he served as prime minister. It was true that at the height
of the baht crisis he asked General Mongol Amphornpisit, then supreme
commander in chief, to lead a Thai delegation to China to seek a financial
rescue. For Chavalit had a very good relation?ship with the Chinese government.
The Thai delegation asked for a currency swap agreement worth US$10 billion
with the central bank of China to back up Thailand’s dwindling foreign
exchange reserves. The Communist politburo was readily willing to go along
with the Thai request, but the central bank of China, then headed by Zhou
Rongji, now the Chinese premier, did not concur.
As a result, Thailand was forced into a corner to seek a bailout package
from the International Monetary Fund.
Over the past week Chavalit has been giving interviews in support of
Rerngchai Marakanond, the former Bank of Thailand governor.
This followed a finding of the Finance Ministry panel, headed by Visut
Srisuphan, the directorgeneral of the Department of Comptroller General,
which recommended a civil action against Rerngchai. The panel found that
Rerngchai alone should be held accountable for gross negligence over mismanagement
of the country’s foreign exchange reserves.
During Rerngchai’s governorship, the central bank blew away more than
US$32 billion in foreign exchange reserves in less than six months. The
panel suggested that Rerngchai be fined US$1.2 billion, or Bt70 billion,
over this huge damage that triggered a complete loss of confidence in
the baht.
After the panel’s finding was made public, there ensued an immediate
outcry that Rerngchai was being made a scapegoat, for he could not squander
the foreign exchange reserves alone, although as governor he should bear
full responsibility.
In the central bank’s bureaucratic practice, management of the foreign
exchange reserves involved the Exchange Equalisation Fund, the Banking
Department and the Currency Account, which backs the baht circulation.
Moreover, the Economic Research Department also provided the strategy
on the macroeconomic and currency out?look.
So all those people in these departments should also be held accountable
if Rerngchai were to be found guilty. In addition, by law, the Finance
Ministry oversees the Bank of Thailand. If something badly went wrong
with the baht, the finance minister, then Dr Amnuay Viravan, should have
taken some action. Amnuay cannot escape blame too. Finally, as prime minister,
Chavalit cannot brush aside responsibility because he was constantly consulted
by Rerngchai, although every time they met Rerngchai would assure him
that the baht situation would be brought under control.
In fact, the Nukul Commission in 1998 completed a landmark report on
how and why the Chavalit government and the central bank under Rerngchai’s
governorship badly mismanaged the foreign exchange reserves.
This commission was formed by Tarrin Nimmanahaeminda, the former finance
minister, to get to the bottom of what went wrong with the baht crisis,
the Bangkok Bank of Commerce debacle and the Financial Institution Development
Fund’s unlimited bailout of financial institutions. After the Nukul Commission,
there were several other panels formed to try to bring to justice those
responsible for the 1997 economic crisis.
Yet the process has been moving at a snail’s pace. Only when the case
is about to expire on December 8 do the authorities try to look busy.
There was a news report suggesting that the Finance Ministry would be
backing off.
It would drop the case against Rerngchai because it was not serving anyone’s
interest. Besides, it would hurt several individuals who have joined the
Thaksin government. Prime Minister Thaksin Shinwatra was himself deputy
prime minister during the 1997 crisis.
So the Finance Ministry has passed the buck to the Bank of Thailand to
deliberate on Rerngchai’s case.
The central bank will be taking a look at the issue today before coming
up with its final verdict as to whether to go ahead with civil action
against Rerngchai or to drop the case.
You already know the result.
Thanong Khanthong
|