Account deficit needs axing
The only way for the Chavalit administration to
win back confidence is to slash the current account deficit. Thanong Khanthong and
Vatchara Charoonsantikul report in the third part of a series on the state of
the economy.
With the macro-economy badly out of shape, the only way for Thailand to win back the
confidence of foreign creditors is to drastically narrow the current account deficit.
The current account deficit, the gap between gross domestic savings and investment
demand, is the key indicator that matters the most under the current gloomy economic
environment. Bringing the deficit down will mean that Thailand is finally recognising its
economic woes brought on by years of overspending.
On January 6, Finance Minister Amnuay Viravan clearly signalled that the government
will tighten its belt by cutting the fiscal budget by at least Bt100 billion over the next
two years. A few days later, Prime Minister Chavalit Yongchaiyudh made a surprise
appearance at the Joint Foreign Chambers of Commerce to back Amnuay's vow, which will
prevent a budget deficit and reduce Thailand's debt load to a more manageable level.
Chavalit's appearance is part of a strategic move to restore confidence by signalling
to the international community that his administration is fully committed to the cause of
guarding Thailand's stability. It is a commitment he and his economic czar will have to
seriously follow through on, although they have not yet spelt out which programmes will be
subject to spending cuts.
Amnuay will have no choice but to follow in the footsteps of the late Sommai
Hoontrakool, a former finance minister who managed Thailand's fiscal budget with an axe in
the early 1980s. ''You don't have to set a target for budget cuts. You just continue to
cut beyond any tax revenue shortfall," Sommai once said about his ruthless approach
to fighting instability.
Why is narrowing the current account deficit so important at this critical juncture?
The answer is simple: Foreign creditors are increasingly casting doubts over Thailand's
creditworthiness because its ability to generate foreign exchange has been severely
hampered by a slowing economy and an export slump.
So, Thailand has to make an all-out effort to assure the international community that
its current account deficit is sustainable. If confidence in the management of the Thai
economy returns, foreign capital will start to flow back into the country and improve
liquidity.
Without liquidity, there is no way for interest rates, which have been on an uptrend
over the past three years, to decrease. High interest rates have been punishing Thai
businesses and the stock market, which plunged 35 per cent last year.
To realise stability, budget cuts are the only answer. They will automatically increase
the savings side and at the same time reduce demand for investment, hence narrowing the
current account deficit, which is projected by the Bank of Thailand to reach 7.9 per cent
(almost Bt400 billion) of gross domestic product (GDP) this year.
Financial markets will feel more comfortable if the current account deficit is narrowed
by at least one or two percentage points as a display of Thailand's serious commitment to
put its financial house in order.
Thailand cannot afford to run up a deficit of Bt400 billion every year from its current
account, particularly if a significant portion of that deficit is financed by short-term
foreign capital. Although Thailand's gross domestic savings is about 35 per cent of GDP,
its demand for investment has reached 41 to 42 per cent of GDP. The balance, or a deficit
in this case, is financed by foreign capital.
A look at the make-up of Thailand's total debt of about US$84 billion (Bt2,100 billion)
causes concern. The private sector accounts for about 87 per cent of the debt while the
government sector accounts for the remaining 13 per cent. This ratio is reversed in
Indonesia (90 per cent public sector and 10 per cent private sector) and Malaysia (80 per
cent public sector and 20 per cent private sector).
That is why Malaysia, which is running a current account deficit of nine per cent of
GDP per year, is not the subject of concern by foreign creditors.
Worse still for Thailand, probably more than half of the private sector's external debt
load is financed by short-term capital, which is the main reason Moody's Investors
Service, the US credit rating agency, downgraded Thailand's short-term debt in September
last year. A downgrade means that Thailand's creditworthiness is being questioned.
Both Moody's and Standard & Poor, another US credit rating agency, have not yet
expressed their concern over Thailand's external debt level. They highlighted their
concern over the rapid accumulation of short-term debts.
In the event of a financial crisis, short-term capital could flow out rapidly,
potentially dealing a de-stabilising effect to the capital- deficit country.
|