Thanong Bidaya, the new finance minister, will need a master plan to
cope with the pressure for a one-time devaluation, say Vatchara Charoonsantikul and
Thanong Khanthong.
Devaluation rumours reached fever pitch last Thursday following the resignation of Dr
Amnuay Viravan, the finance minister. However, the financial markets calmed down
significantly when they learnt that Dr Thanong Bidaya, the president of the Thai Military
Bank, was to succeed Amnuay because he was likely to follow his predecessor's staunch
anti-devaluation policy. Would he or would he not?
Over the weekend, Thanong side-stepped a question over the government's foreign
exchange policy. ''At this point I do not want to give any opinions about the foreign
exchange policy because it may create misunderstandings. I've already had an idea in my
mind and have also consulted with Mom Tao (MR Chatu Mongkol Sonakul, the
permanent-secretary for finance)."
On Thursday, flanked by his ''Jurassic Park" Cabinet, Gen Chavalit Yongchaiyudh,
the prime minister, come out frantically to soothe nervousness in the financial markets by
insisting that the government had no policy whatsoever to devalue the baht. The following
day saw the onshore baht calm down to between Bt25.90 and Bt26.02 and the offshore baht to
between Bt24.94 and Bt25.40, against Thursday's rates of between Bt25.85 to Bt27.02 and
Bt25.10 respectively.
Thanong should have shown a hawkish stance on the foreign exchange policy by echoing
the prime minister's ringing endorsement of the baht. What the banking authorities have
been fighting over the past six months is defence of the baht until the country has more
breathing space to rectify its macro-economic imbalances.
In an interview with Wattachak before taking over the finance portfolio, Thanong
showed that he had a very good understanding of the Thai economic problems, but when it
came to the question of foreign exchange policy, he did not have a ready-made answer.
''While our economy is running into problems, cutting the interest rates will further
deteriorate the Thai financial cycle. With the abnormal economic conditions, speculation
(in the foreign exchange market) is rampant, making it difficult to cut the rates,
particularly at a time when there is a big gap between the interest rates of the
commercial banks and the finance companies," he said.
Thanong threw his weight behind the central bank's stern action to defend the baht in
the foreign exchange market. He noted: ''What is particularly important is that the
authorities must manage the foreign exchange policy in such a fashion that it will not
affect the production and distribution of goods. This is extremely difficult to do because
if you tackle one point, it will have an impact on the other."
On Saturday, Thanong asserted that he'll look after capital inflows as a priority,
ensure that the foreign capital is used productively instead of being channelled into
bailing out the unproductive real estate sector.
While the financial markets are giving him the benefit of the doubt over his
qualifications to tackle the financial and foreign exchange crises, Thanong demonstrated
his humble nature by showing a willingness to learn. On Saturday he had lunch at the Siam
City Hotel with Dr Suthee Singhasaneh, a former finance minister, where the guru gave him
some recommendations on how to conduct and project his ministership.
Apparently, devaluation is the last thing the Bank of Thailand has in mind. As finance
minister, Thanong will automatically chair the Exchange Equalisation Fund, the foreign
exchange management arm of the BOT. He'll have the final say on any adjustments to the
foreign exchange policy.
A study conducted by Dr Olarn Chaipravat, the president of the Siam Commercial Bank, is
worth noting. It showed that there are more losses than gains in a devaluation due to the
heavy dependence of the Thai industrial structure on imports for value-added re-export.
Import content accounts for about 42 per cent of total exports, while the remaining 58
per cent represents domestic value-added content, which consists of capital and labour,
the study says.
In a scenario for any baht devaluation, import content will rise at the same rate as
the devaluation. Capital and labour will also be affected.
On the capital side, production costs will rise after a devaluation, a rise that will
be equivalent to the interest costs that will become higher. The interest costs will jump
to the equivalent rate of inflation, which increases, say, at 4.5 per cent this year.
Labour will also be adversely affected by a devaluation and there would be calls for
wage increases due to the increase in inflation, which is a direct consequence of the
devaluation.
In a 10 per cent devaluation scenario, imports will rise by 10 per cent, pushing up the
costs of the 42 per cent import content of Thailand's industrial sector by 9.89 per cent.
The following is how the 9.89 per cent figure is derived:
Imports will carry a higher baht cost in proportion to the devaluation. In the case of
the 42 per cent import content and a 10 per cent baht devaluation, the cost will rise by
(42 per cent) X (10 per cent) = 4.2 per cent.
On the domestic value-added side, capital normally accounts for 35 per cent of total
costs, compared to 65 per cent for labour. So capital costs will rise by another 4.2 per
cent from a 10 per cent devaluation, on top of the interest costs they normally carry of
13 per cent (the prime rate).
Yet Thai exporters have been enjoying a subsidy from the government through the Export
and Import Bank of Thailand, where they can muster a steady interest rate of 7 per cent.
Through the Exim Bank, the exporters can borrow 50 per cent cent of their total
borrowing demand, so they end up paying the interest cost of (13 per cent + 7 per cent)
divided by 2 = 10 per cent.
In the case of a 10 per cent devaluation, exporters' total costs will be (13 per cent +
4.2 per cent + 7 per cent) divided by 2 = 12.1 per cent. This is equivalent to an increase
of (12.1 per cent - 10 per cent) divided by 10 per cent = 21 per cent.
When taking the ratio of capital and the assumption of a depreciation cost of 30 per
cent, the cost increase will be equivalent to (35 per cent) X (42 per cent) X (1 - 30 per
cent) X (21 per cent) = 2.98 per cent.
Labour, which makes up by about 65 per cent, will be affected by the devaluation by
wage increases. Suppose that wage costs rise equivalent to the inflation rate of 4.2 per
cent plus the rise in capital cost by 2.98 per cent, labour costs will increase by (65 per
cent) X (58 per cent) X (7.18 per cent) = 2.71 per cent.
So when all the rising costs from the devaluation are combined, one arrives at higher
over all costs for Thai exporters at (4.2 per cent + 2.98 per cent + 2.71 per cent) = 9.89
per cent.
Based on these calculations, it is clear that a 10 per cent devaluation will almost
offset the rising costs of 9.89 per cent faced by Thai exporters. a devaluation in the
first round will have a subsequent impact on the input of all goods manufactured
afterward, with the accumulated cost rising eventually to 26.09 per cent twice as high
as the devaluation, the study said.
Worse still, devaluation will affect interest and principal payments of Thai
corporations, which are now saddling themselves with US$61.39 billion in external debts. A
10 per cent devaluation will cost ($61.39 billion) X (10 per cent) = $6.13 billion or
Bt158.39 billion, or 3.21 per cent of Thailand's gross domestic product (GDP).
All Thai corporations which borrow either in US dollars or yen or both will face
enormous losses, which will trigger bankruptcies, factory shutdowns and widespread
unemployment.
To avoid a devaluation, the Olarn study suggested that the government and the private
sector come up with a grand strategy to reconstruct the Thai economy.
First, the government must undertake fiscal consolidation. Both government agencies and
state enterprises must cut their spending. The budget must be balanced.
Second, the baht interest rate must be cut and financial institutions must raise their
credit growth to allow the economy to pick up and help the businesses to recover.
Third, all industries and companies must improve productivity and increase
competitiveness so that they can compete on the global markets.
Fourth, a backforward and forward linkages strategy must be implemented to deepen the
industrial structure of Thailand and increase the value-added content and substitute for
raw material imports. (Reduce the import content by 42 per cent, and increase the domestic
value-added component by 58 per cent).
Fifth, there should be a campaign for the private sector, businesses and the public to
increase long-term savings, in order to reduce Thailand's dependence on foreign capital
and narrow the investment savings gap. The current account deficit should be targeted to
fall to zero per cent of the GDP within the next five years.
Sixth, gradual adjustment of the baht against the basket of currencies by widening the
trading band by one to two per cent a year to attract dollars or yen into the country.
This can be accomplished by international roadshows on a regular basis.
The baht interest rates must be brought down by 1 to 2 per cent in the first year of
the policy implementation.
The goal is that the baht interbank rate should hover above the US dollar interbank
rate by a differential of 2 per cent. Now the differential is more than 5 per cent.
If the US interbank rate or the Libor rate are up, the baht interbank rate should also
rise proportionately, ideally by not more than 2 percentage points.